If PlayStation owners can’t play CoD, they’re just going to buy Battlefield, right?
As Xbox tries to complete its acquisition of Activision Blizzard, its war of words with PlayStation continues to heat up. Meanwhile, EA’s CEO also shared his thoughts, acknowledging that the deal is in the works and that it’s actually a good thing that Call of Duty could become an Xbox exclusive. At least for EA.
Andrew Wilson at a Goldman Sachs event via Stephen Totillo (Thanks, VGC) The potential for Call of Duty to become a console exclusive is good news for Battlefield. “In a world where there may be questions about the future of Call of Duty and which platforms may or may not be live, being platform-agnostic and fully cross-platform with Battlefield, I think this is a huge opportunity,” Wilson said.
The CEO’s comments come amid growing discomfort between PlayStation’s Jim Ryan and Xbox’s Phil Spencer. First, Sony expressed concerns about Call of Duty becoming an Xbox exclusive, acknowledging that creating a contender for the series might be impossible. Spencer clarified that Xbox has no plans to make any Activision Blizzard games exclusive if the acquisition happens.
Ryan then labeled the Call of Duty proposal as what Xbox called “insufficient.” This runs counter to the belief that Xbox will be obligated to launch Call of Duty games on PlayStation for at least three years. Spencer reiterated that he has no intention of making Call of Duty an Xbox exclusive, and questioned how removing the game from the PlayStation would benefit potential new owners of the series.
While it might come as a surprise for anyone in the industry to want an acquisition outside of the parties involved, EA clearly foresees a void in the market if Call of Duty is pulled from PlayStation. After the missteps of Battlefield 2042, it was a much-needed opportunity to take its first-person shooter franchise to the next level.
NEXT: Flippin Misfits Preview – Dizzy Rascals